//honeypot demagogic

 Forum DhammaCitta. Forum Diskusi Buddhis Indonesia

Author Topic: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)  (Read 7460 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bond

  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 3.666
  • Reputasi: 189
  • Buddhang Saranam Gacchami...
Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« on: 06 January 2008, 10:25:33 AM »
After almost three months of Shin Kavi becoming a SāmaÓera (Novice), one Yay-lai Sayadaw of Meik-hti-lar town had a dream. In it, he saw two white elephants entered his monastery. Not long afterwards, he was told by U Pyo Tha of Myingyan town and U Ba San, a clerk who work at the Steel Brother’s company, that there had appeared two Arahantas at Maung-Yin-Paw ravine near Sun Lun village and that they were illiterate SāmaÓeras (Novices). The Yay-lai Sayadaw said that Ariyā must know Conventional Truth as against Ultimate Truth and also about the Laws of Nature. He wished to test them and so sent for them.

On arrival at the Yay-lai  monastery at Meik-hti-lar town, Shin Kavi and Shin Vijaya were questioned by the Yay-lai Sayadaw, who was convinced that Shin Kavi had accomplished his Task as Bhikkhu (i.e, become an Arahanta). He then entered into a discussion on Dhamma with the SāmaÓera (Novice), the gist of which now follows:-

                                         

 

Questions asked by the Yay-lai Sayadaw and Shin Kavi’s answeres.

 

(Q). Who is the builder of the house in the three spheres of existence?

(A). Craving (TaÓhā) is the builder, Venerable sir.

 

(Q). What is the seed-germ in the volitional activities (Sa~khāra) of the three spheres?

(A). It is Ignorance (Avijjā) which is the seed-germ, Venerable sir.

 

(Q). Is it on account of merit or demerit that human existence is brought about?

(A). It is on account of merit and demerit, Venerable sir.

 

(Q). Would you call merit happiness or suffering?

(A). Merit is said to be happiness; in fact it is suffering.

 

(Q). Are there Human happiness and DevÈ happiness?

(A). There are Human happiness and DevÈ happiness in the world of conditioned things. In the

       Ultimate sense there is no such thing.

 

(Q). Are there individuals that suffer in the Niraya realms. Are there individuals that enjoy

       pleasures in DevÈ realms?

(A). No, Venerable sir.

 

 

 

(Q). There are in the world, two types or categories, those that enjoy pleasure and those that

       suffer pain. Which category would you call is truly in existence?

(A). Both of them are truly in existence, Venerable sir.

 

(Q). How would you call them?

(A). They are called Mentality (Nāma) and Corporeality (R|pa).

 

(Q). Are there in the world, the killer and the killed?

(A. Yes, there are, Venerable sir.

 

(Q). In What way do you say so?

(A). They mean Mentality (Nāma) and Corporeality (R|pa).

 

(Q). Is it correct to say that one who kills another falls to Niraya?

(A). It is correct, Venerable sir.

 

(Q). If so in what sense do you say so?

(A). It is Mentality and Corporeality that send one to Niraya. It is again Mentality and

       Corporeality that prevent one from falling to Niraya, and that send one up to Nibbāna.

 

(Q). There is the belief that (in the world) there is the killer and the killed.There is another

       belief that there is no killer and none that is killed. Which of these two views are the

       correct view, and which the evil view?

(A). Apart from Corporeality and Mentality, both those views are to be called evil views, 

       Venerable sir.

 

(Q). When is a view, right-view?

(A). When one holds that Corporeality (R|pa) and Mentality (Nāma) do exit in reality, it

       becomes right-view, Venerable sir.

 

(Q). Could one who does not comprehend Ultimate Reality fulfill the ten Perfections

       (Pāramīs)?

(A). No, Venerable sir.

 

(Q). Of the two truth, the Conventional Truth and Ultimate Truth, can one who only knows

       Conventional Truth realize the Magga ©ÈÓa.

(A). No, Venerable Sir.

 

(Q). Which would you call is the truth, Conventional Truth or Ultimate Reality.

(A). Only Ultimate Reality can be called the truth.

 

(Q). Of the two views, the evil view and the correct view, when does a view become the right-

       view?

(A). A view becomes right view when begins to be free from mistaken belief (Diţţhi) and

       doubt or vacillation (Vicikicchā).

 

The Yay-lai Sayadaw was satisfied with SāmaÓera U Kavi’s answer and said to him. “Very good indeed! U Kavi, knowledge of reality of this nature is very profound. From now on, we wish to practice your method. Would you kindly stay here in our monastery for about one rains-retreat period (VāsÈ) so that you may teach the Dhamma to our lay supporters so that they would be saved from falling to the miserable states of Apāya.”

“Very well, Venerable Sir,” replied U Kavi, “just now, I am looking for someone to give me guidance. So your invitation is very welcome.”

 

 
Note: ShinKavi/ Myingyan Sayadaw/Sunlun Sayadaw adalah kalau tidak salah satu angkatan dengan Mahasi Sayadaw tetapi sudah Almarhum.Tanya jawab ini merupakan konfirmasi apakah seorang telah mencapai Arahat atau tidak, tentunya masih ada kriteria lainnya yg mungkin kita belum tahu.

http://www.sunlun-meditation.com.mm/Content_6.htm

Smoga bermanfaat _/\_
 


Natthi me saranam annam, Buddho me saranam varam, Etena saccavajjena, Sotthi te hotu sabbada

Offline Suchamda

  • Sahabat Baik
  • ****
  • Posts: 556
  • Reputasi: 14
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #1 on: 06 January 2008, 11:21:58 AM »
It is just belief. Believe me.
"We don't use the Pali Canon as a basis for orthodoxy, we use the Pali Canon to investigate our experience." -- Ajahn Sumedho

Offline Sumedho

  • Kebetulan
  • Administrator
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 12.406
  • Reputasi: 423
  • Gender: Male
  • not self
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #2 on: 06 January 2008, 11:40:42 AM »
It is just belief. Believe me.
believing you is a belief too, isn't it :P
There is no place like 127.0.0.1

Offline Suchamda

  • Sahabat Baik
  • ****
  • Posts: 556
  • Reputasi: 14
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #3 on: 06 January 2008, 11:56:27 AM »
Quote
believing you is a belief too, isn't it

hehehe.....kind of tricky words.
No, not really. I don't have belief about ultimate truth. Just being aware of the relative phenomena.
"We don't use the Pali Canon as a basis for orthodoxy, we use the Pali Canon to investigate our experience." -- Ajahn Sumedho

Offline Sumedho

  • Kebetulan
  • Administrator
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 12.406
  • Reputasi: 423
  • Gender: Male
  • not self
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #4 on: 06 January 2008, 12:11:02 PM »
oh words oh words  ^-^
There is no place like 127.0.0.1

Offline Suchamda

  • Sahabat Baik
  • ****
  • Posts: 556
  • Reputasi: 14
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #5 on: 06 January 2008, 12:59:54 PM »
 ^-^
"We don't use the Pali Canon as a basis for orthodoxy, we use the Pali Canon to investigate our experience." -- Ajahn Sumedho

Offline EVO

  • Sebelumnya Metta
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 1.369
  • Reputasi: 60
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #6 on: 06 January 2008, 01:22:41 PM »
hmmm ??? ??? ???
engak ngerti inggris :'(

seorang tidak waras dan seorang arahat :D
kedua duanya tersenyum :)
seorang arahat tahu kenapa dirinya tersenyum :)
sebaliknya seorang tidak waras tidak tahu mengapa dirinya tersenyum ;D

Offline Suchamda

  • Sahabat Baik
  • ****
  • Posts: 556
  • Reputasi: 14
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #7 on: 06 January 2008, 01:25:34 PM »
Seorang arahat tahu bahwa sebenarnya tidak ada senyuman. 8)
"We don't use the Pali Canon as a basis for orthodoxy, we use the Pali Canon to investigate our experience." -- Ajahn Sumedho

Offline EVO

  • Sebelumnya Metta
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 1.369
  • Reputasi: 60
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #8 on: 06 January 2008, 01:38:52 PM »
Seorang arahat tahu bahwa sebenarnya tidak ada senyuman. 8)

 ^:)^ ampun saya engak tau kalau seorang arahat tahu bahwa sebenarnya tidak ada senyuman
saya belum arahat sih ;D ;D ;D

Offline Kembara

  • Sahabat
  • ***
  • Posts: 426
  • Reputasi: 13
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #9 on: 06 January 2008, 01:43:40 PM »
Sebaliknya seorang yang tidak waras tidak tahu artinya sebuah senyuman  8)
SABBE SATTA BHAVANTU SUKHITATTA
SADHU, SADHU, SADHU.

_/\_


Offline Suchamda

  • Sahabat Baik
  • ****
  • Posts: 556
  • Reputasi: 14
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #10 on: 06 January 2008, 01:46:03 PM »
Quote
ampun saya engak tau kalau seorang arahat tahu bahwa sebenarnya tidak ada senyuman
saya belum arahat sih

Apakah untuk tahu harus jadi arahat dulu? 8)
"We don't use the Pali Canon as a basis for orthodoxy, we use the Pali Canon to investigate our experience." -- Ajahn Sumedho

Offline Sumedho

  • Kebetulan
  • Administrator
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 12.406
  • Reputasi: 423
  • Gender: Male
  • not self
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #11 on: 06 January 2008, 03:30:08 PM »
Seorang arahat tahu bahwa sebenarnya tidak ada senyuman. 8)

 ^:)^ ampun saya engak tau kalau seorang arahat tahu bahwa sebenarnya tidak ada senyuman
saya belum arahat sih ;D ;D ;D
ada perbedaan antara "arahat tidak bisa tersenyum" dan "arahat mengetahui tidak ada senyuman"
:)

There is no place like 127.0.0.1

Offline bond

  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 3.666
  • Reputasi: 189
  • Buddhang Saranam Gacchami...
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #12 on: 06 January 2008, 05:25:25 PM »
Phet-pin-aing Sayadaw puts questions to U Kavi at Abyarr village in Pegu (Bago) Township, on the 4th waning day of Kason (May) 1287ME.

(A Concise Record)

 

(Q). When eye and visual object come together does the eye go to the object, or does the object

       go to the eye?

(A). Neither of them goes to each other, Venerable Sir.

 

 

(Q). Then how does the ‘seeing’ take place?

(A). By the functioning of the necessary faculty, the seeing is made possible, Venerable Sir.

 

(Q). If that's so, could we say the visual object goes to the eye?

(A). No, Venerable Sir, (Let me illustrate:) when you look at the sun, there is the bright

       sunlight that causes the eye to wink with discomfort. The sun does not physically enter the

       eye, nor does the eye enter the sun.

 

(Q). Well, now, tell me about Nibbāna.

(A). Venerable Sir! Lets say a Yogi on making Vipassanā practice considers Mind, Mental

       Concomitants and Body as a great (cause of) suffering, and feeling disenchanted with

       them, probes into the cause of suffering: he discerns that the cause is Tanhā (Craving). 

       As soon as he understands this Truth, the Path-Knowledge (Magga-Phala) abandons Tanhā

       (Craving) and thereby the cause having been destroyed, the result does not come about.

       Here, what had been taking place, involving arising and perishing, is Sannkhata. When

       cause is destroyed and its effect is broken nothing (no rise and fall) takes place: this is

       Asankhata, Nibbāna.

 

(Q). In that Nibbāna, are there shining objects like the sun or the moon or any bright lights?

(A). No, Venerable Sir.

 

(Q). If so, describe what Nibbāna look like?

(A). I can't describe it, Venerable Sir.

 

(Q). In that's case, there is no Nibbāna?

(A). Yes, Venerable Sir, Nibbāna does exist.

 

(Q). There are the four Ultimate Realities of Mind, Mental Concomitants, Body (Corporeality)

       and Nibbāna, Isn't it so?

(A). That's right, Venerable Sir.

 

(Q). Tell me, what is Ultimate Reality?

(A). Venerable Sir! U Kavi has no words for Ultimate Reality. He has just to remain silent.

 

(Q). Well, well. Suppose someone were to call a block of gold, a piece of lead. Would that

       gold turn into the lead?

(A). No, Venerable Sir, it wouldn't. However, Ultimate Reality (Paramatta) cannot be

       demonstrated as with Conventional Truths (PaÒÒatta). When Mind and Body do not rise

       and fall, when there is no more arising (Upādāna), momentary existing (®hiti) and

       dissolution (Bhanga),(Upāda-®hiti-Bhanga) and there is a complete cessation, it is called

       Nibbāna.

(Q). Tell me, how the ten stages of Insight (©ÈÓa) are developed?

(A). Let's say, a YogÊ practicing Ānāpāna, having gained concentration and keeps mindful of

       bodily sensations. At first, he observes the sensation as perception. In time, he comes to

       understand the arising and the dissolution of sensation in its real nature. Then he feels

       dread and disgust about the nature of rising and falling in him.

 

(Q). The ten Insights are to be developed one by one? Is that not so?

(A). That is up to one’s choice, Venerable Sir.

 

(Q). How is it achieved without going one by one?

(A). By merely developing Sammasana nana, i.e. contemplating the three salient marks of 

       conditioned things, Insight is gained into rise and fall of phenomena followed by dread

       and disgust about them. (Sayadaw intervenes here): "Well, wait a moment!, when you

       contemplate the three marks of conditioned things (Sammasana nyana/Tilakhana knowledge), you understand rise

       and fall of phenomena that is Udayabbaya nyana(Rise and fall knowledge) , you see the dissolution of phenomena

       which is Bhanga nyana. You feel dread about it that is Bhaya nyana. You feel disgust about

       it that is ĀdÊnava nyana. Yes that's correct, quite correct")

 

(Q). U Kavi, in the world, by conventional usage, there are Sotāpannas, Sakadāgāmis,

       Anāgāmis and Arahantas, are there not?

(A). There are, Venerable Sir.

 

(Q). Do those Ariyās progress along the path stage by stage?

(A). No, Venerable Sir, they do not.

 

(Q). Then how do they progress? Would you tell me?

(A). Let's say, when a YogÊ has developed Insight into the nature of the rise and fall through

       Sammasana-nyana and advanced the Knowledge through the ten stages of Insight

       Knowledge, he is called by conventional usage, a SotÈpanna. Then he again cultivates the

       ten Insight Knowledge and when he has done so, he is called a Sakadāgāmi. By advancing

       this mode of cultivation of Insight for four times, he is called an Arahanta. (No further

       record of these discussion made due to excessive references to Mundane usage).



Note: ada beberapa istilah memakai bahasa pali myanmar dan beberap sudah saya ganti ke bahasa pali yg kita kenal, tapi smoga tetap bisa menangkap arti sebenarnya. Tahapan2 dalam vipasana yg mencapai sotapanna-arahat terletak pada peninjauan ulang dari nyana2 yg ada. Silakan di baca mengenai nyana yg didapat melalui vipasanna di http://www.dhammacitta.org/forum/index.php?topic=1304.0
 


 _/\_
« Last Edit: 06 January 2008, 07:08:30 PM by bond »
Natthi me saranam annam, Buddho me saranam varam, Etena saccavajjena, Sotthi te hotu sabbada

Offline Kelana

  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 2.225
  • Reputasi: 142
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #13 on: 08 January 2008, 07:28:05 PM »
Quote
believing you is a belief too, isn't it

hehehe.....kind of tricky words.
No, not really. I don't have belief about ultimate truth. Just being aware of the relative phenomena.
:) :whistle:
GKBU
 
_/\_ suvatthi hotu


- finire -

Offline Sukma Kemenyan

  • Global Moderator
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 1.840
  • Reputasi: 109
Re: Mengetahui Arahat(Tanya jawab)
« Reply #14 on: 08 January 2008, 07:31:20 PM »
Bantuin Translate dunk... (dalam bahasa Indo-Buddhism)

DC Wiki -  Yay-lai Sayadaw & Shin Kavi -- (login pake login forum)
« Last Edit: 08 January 2008, 09:43:30 PM by Kemenyan »

 

anything