//honeypot demagogic

 Forum DhammaCitta. Forum Diskusi Buddhis Indonesia

Author Topic: Rfid indentity theft oleh unouthrized Rfid reader  (Read 1357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kullatiro

  • Sebelumnya: Daimond
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 6.155
  • Reputasi: 97
  • Gender: Male
  • Ehmm, Selamat mencapai Nibbana
Rfid indentity theft oleh unouthrized Rfid reader
« on: 06 June 2013, 12:17:18 PM »
Tampaknya masih belum terjadi di indonesia, tapi sudah mulai marak di luar sana. Seperti di ketahui saat ini sudah banyak penggunaan Rfid dari e-ktp sampai kartu rfid untuk belanja (flazz, dll), kartu busway dll.

hingga timbul pencegahan agar kartu kartu kita yang mengandung Rfid ini dapat di proteksi, menggunakan dompet yang mencegah (blocking Rfid sinyal) agar tidak di baca rfid reader yang tidak di inginkan.



http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ainste/ainste-front-pocket-rfid-blocking-wallets?ref=category



Offline Sumedho

  • Kebetulan
  • Administrator
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 12.406
  • Reputasi: 423
  • Gender: Male
  • not self
Re: Rfid indentity theft oleh unouthrized Rfid reader
« Reply #1 on: 07 June 2013, 08:04:16 AM »
AFAIK kalo beberapa RFID card digabung bersamaan nda bisa discan. jadi hipotesis bodohnya, gabung aja beberapa card yg ber rfid dalam 1 wallet, jadinya yah aman. atau potong aluminium foil dan di selipkan bareng uang utk protect card di dompet ;D
There is no place like 127.0.0.1

Offline kullatiro

  • Sebelumnya: Daimond
  • KalyanaMitta
  • *****
  • Posts: 6.155
  • Reputasi: 97
  • Gender: Male
  • Ehmm, Selamat mencapai Nibbana
Identity theft: Alan Cooper Problem
« Reply #2 on: 07 June 2013, 06:59:29 PM »
Prenda sues Cooper, blog commenters

In February, 2013, Prenda Law Inc., Paul Duffy, Paul Hansmeier and John Steele sued Alan Cooper, his attorney, and numerous "John Doe" defendants in an Illinois state court , alleging "defamation." (Cooper had sued Prenda alleging, as was later found to be true by Judge Wright in his sanctions order, that Prenda had "stolen his identity .") The Doe defendants were people who had left comments on two blogs known for being critical of Prenda Law, Fight Copyright Trolls and Die Troll Die .

Shortly thereafter, Prenda Law served a subpoena on Automattic, Inc., the parent company of WordPress, the blog software and hosting provider.

The subpoena sought production of all Internet Protocol addresses who accessed [either blog] from January 11, 2011 through February 25, 2013, as well as the identities of the two anonymous bloggers. [22] At least one commentator has characterized the lawsuits as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation
or "SLAPP" suits. [23] WordPress refused to comply with the subpoena without a judicial order, terming it "overly broad." The Electronic Frontier Foundation offered the two blogs a free legal
defense, [24][25] and on May 16, 2013, the court granted EFF's Motion to Quash Subpoena -- because Prenda didn't file a response.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prenda_Law
« Last Edit: 07 June 2013, 07:01:08 PM by kullatiro »